Logos

DERIVATIONder.spa.la-concordancia-separa-la-pasiva-de-la-impersonal

agreement separates the reflexive passive from the impersonal

One pattern copies the number of the phrase beside it and the other stays singular whatever stands there, and the copying is the whole of the difference.

Two constructions with the same clitic and the same word order are told apart by one property, and the property is one the graph already has an operation for. If the verb copies the number of the phrase, the phrase controls the verb and is therefore a subject, which makes the clause a passive built with a clitic. If the verb stays singular, nothing controls it and the clause has no subject, which makes it impersonal. Both patterns exclude a phrase naming the participant that acts, and that shared restriction is why they are confusable in the first place. The pair is contested because the field disagrees about whether the copying in the first is genuine control.

statusstatus
contestedasserted, and the sources disagree
provenanceprovenance
authoredwritten for Logos, from first principles
derivation statusderivation_status
unstatednobody has said whether it follows from anything
saliencesalience
No salience. Where no frequency source applies the object carries none, rather than a default or a guess (03-schema.md §3.5).
aliasesaliases
None recorded.
sourcessources
  • SOURCENueva gramática de la lengua española (2009)src.nueva-gramaticano page in v1
  • SOURCEA New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish (Butt and Benjamin)src.butt-benjaminno page in v1

Premises

derivation.premises

What has to be true for this chain to run. Roughly half of a chain's premises are other derivations, so a premise is often itself a chain.

agreement separates the reflexive passive from the impersonal

One pattern copies the number of the phrase beside it and the other stays singular whatever stands there, and the copying is the whole of the difference.

contestedforward

Premises (2)

Conclusions (2)

derives 2 of 2enumerated

None.

Premises and conclusions declare no order (A16); listed alphabetically by id, a display choice and not a claim about which matters most. The steps above them are the one part of this component that IS a declared sequence, read from the applies-to composition chain.

Conclusions

derivation.conclusions

What the chain establishes. This is a set rather than a single fact: 45 percent of sampled derivations conclude about several things at once, and the several-ness is the claim.

Coverage, and what it does not reach

derivation.coverage

The arithmetic half is a required field and the build checks it. The residue rows are the structured half of the same statement.

derives 2 of 2enumerated

None.

every case was counted, and the count closes: nothing is left over

Residue

No residue row. Where the coverage statement above says nothing is left over, that agreement is the record being consistent with itself; where it does not, the structured half is missing.

Everything joined to this object

One group per typed edge, in both directions. A1b guarantees no object node is an orphan, so this is the whole navigation: an object with no edges would have failed the build rather than reached this page.

What this object is a kind of

Walking this object's own `is-a` edges: what it is a kind of. Several branches from one object are several classification axes, not competing supertypes.

objects
1
places drawn
1
multi-parent
None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.

Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.

Fan-out per dimension

A4

One row per dimension, largest first. That is a display order, not a verdict: 03-schema.md declares no threshold above which fan-out is too much, so this reports the count and grades nothing.

  • case13 values
  • mood8 values
  • voice8 values
  • aspect7 values
  • aktionsart6 values
  • number6 values
  • person6 values
  • tense6 values
  • comparison4 values
  • evidentiality4 values
  • gender4 values
  • politeness4 values
  • valency4 values
  • animacy3 values
  • definiteness3 values
  • deixis3 values
  • finiteness2 values
  • information structure2 values
  • interrogativity2 values
  • polarity2 values
  • switch-reference2 values

What kinds of this object there are

Walking the `is-a` edges that point at this object: what kinds of it there are. An object reachable two ways is drawn in both places and is still one object.

objects
1
places drawn
1
multi-parent
None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.

Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.

Every one of this object’s 6 edges are rendered above, in the sections its own type owns. Nothing is missing here and nothing is repeated.