DERIVATIONder.spa.valores-de-animacidad
the animacy dimension is realized in two of its three values
The ranking is consulted for the two values at the top of it and the third is the unmarked case that the rule simply fails to reach.
A ranking realized at one decision point does not thereby realize every value on it. The two values at the top trigger the marker, and the marker is their only exponent. The value at the bottom triggers nothing, so it has no exponent at all and is diagnosed by the absence of one. Recording it as residue rather than as a realized value is the difference between saying the language distinguishes three degrees of animacy and saying it marks two of them, and only the second is true.
- status
status documentedasserted, and the sources agree- provenance
provenance authoredwritten for Logos, from first principles- derivation status
derivation_status unstatednobody has said whether it follows from anything- salience
salience - No salience. Where no frequency source applies the object carries none, rather than a default or a guess (03-schema.md §3.5).
- aliases
aliases - None recorded.
- sources
sources - SOURCENueva gramática de la lengua española (2009)
src.nueva-gramaticano page in v1
- SOURCENueva gramática de la lengua española (2009)
Premises
derivation.premisesWhat has to be true for this chain to run. Roughly half of a chain's premises are other derivations, so a premise is often itself a chain.
- CATEGORYanimacy
cat.animacy - DERIVATIONanimacy is grammatically visible in one position only
der.spa.la-animacidad-solo-es-visible-en-el-objeto
the animacy dimension is realized in two of its three values
The ranking is consulted for the two values at the top of it and the third is the unmarked case that the rule simply fails to reach.
Premises (2)
Conclusions (2)
derives 2 of 3enumerated
The value at the bottom of the ranking, which is never marked and is diagnosed only by the absence of the marker.
Residue (1)
- CATEGORYinanimateunstatedno failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why
Premises and conclusions declare no order (A16); listed alphabetically by id, a display choice and not a claim about which matters most. The steps above them are the one part of this component that IS a declared sequence, read from the applies-to composition chain.
Conclusions
derivation.conclusionsWhat the chain establishes. This is a set rather than a single fact: 45 percent of sampled derivations conclude about several things at once, and the several-ness is the claim.
Coverage, and what it does not reach
derivation.coverageThe arithmetic half is a required field and the build checks it. The residue rows are the structured half of the same statement.
derives 2 of 3enumerated
The value at the bottom of the ranking, which is never marked and is diagnosed only by the absence of the marker.
every case was counted
Residue
- CATEGORYinanimate
cat.inanimate- fails on
derives.payload.failed_premise - No failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why.
- fails on
Everything joined to this object
One group per typed edge, in both directions. A1b guarantees no object node is an orphan, so this is the whole navigation: an object with no edges would have failed the build rather than reached this page.
What this object is a kind of
Walking this object's own `is-a` edges: what it is a kind of. Several branches from one object are several classification axes, not competing supertypes.
- objects
- 1
- places drawn
- 1
- multi-parent
- None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.
- DERIVATIONthe animacy dimension is realized in two of its three values
der.spa.valores-de-animacidadDERIVATIONThe ranking is consulted for the two values at the top of it and the third is the unmarked case that the rule simply fails to reach.
Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.
Fan-out per dimension
A4One row per dimension, largest first. That is a display order, not a verdict: 03-schema.md declares no threshold above which fan-out is too much, so this reports the count and grades nothing.
- case13 values
- mood8 values
- voice8 values
- aspect7 values
- aktionsart6 values
- number6 values
- person6 values
- tense6 values
- comparison4 values
- evidentiality4 values
- gender4 values
- politeness4 values
- valency4 values
- animacy3 values
- definiteness3 values
- deixis3 values
- finiteness2 values
- information structure2 values
- interrogativity2 values
- polarity2 values
- switch-reference2 values
What kinds of this object there are
Walking the `is-a` edges that point at this object: what kinds of it there are. An object reachable two ways is drawn in both places and is still one object.
- objects
- 1
- places drawn
- 1
- multi-parent
- None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.
- DERIVATIONthe animacy dimension is realized in two of its three values
der.spa.valores-de-animacidadDERIVATIONThe ranking is consulted for the two values at the top of it and the third is the unmarked case that the rule simply fails to reach.
Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.