Logos

DERIVATIONder.spa.valores-de-evidencialidad

no value of the information-source dimension is grammatically realized

Four values are available and the language marks none, stating how a speaker came by what is asserted with separate words when it states it at all.

Two things in the language come close and neither closes the gap, which is why the honest record is absence with the near misses named. A copula of appearance marks a property as judged from evidence. A modal predicate marks an event as inferred rather than asserted. Both are constructions available to a speaker who chooses them, and neither is required of any clause, so nothing forces a speaker to state a source. That is the test a realized value has to pass here, and the four values fail it together.

statusstatus
documentedasserted, and the sources agree
provenanceprovenance
authoredwritten for Logos, from first principles
derivation statusderivation_status
unstatednobody has said whether it follows from anything
saliencesalience
No salience. Where no frequency source applies the object carries none, rather than a default or a guess (03-schema.md §3.5).
aliasesaliases
None recorded.
sourcessources
  • SOURCEUniMorph Schema (Sylak-Glassman 2016)src.unimorph-schemano page in v1

Premises

derivation.premises

What has to be true for this chain to run. Roughly half of a chain's premises are other derivations, so a premise is often itself a chain.

no value of the information-source dimension is grammatically realized

Four values are available and the language marks none, stating how a speaker came by what is asserted with separate words when it states it at all.

documentedforward

Premises (2)

Conclusions (1)

derives 0 of 4enumerated

All four values. One construction comes close by marking a property as judged from appearance, and one predicate marks an inference, and neither is a grammatical exponent of the dimension.

Residue (4)

  • CATEGORYassumedunstatedno failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why
  • CATEGORYdirect evidenceunstatedno failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why
  • CATEGORYinferredunstatedno failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why
  • CATEGORYreportedunstatedno failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why

Premises and conclusions declare no order (A16); listed alphabetically by id, a display choice and not a claim about which matters most. The steps above them are the one part of this component that IS a declared sequence, read from the applies-to composition chain.

Conclusions

derivation.conclusions

What the chain establishes. This is a set rather than a single fact: 45 percent of sampled derivations conclude about several things at once, and the several-ness is the claim.

Coverage, and what it does not reach

derivation.coverage

The arithmetic half is a required field and the build checks it. The residue rows are the structured half of the same statement.

derives 0 of 4enumerated

All four values. One construction comes close by marking a property as judged from appearance, and one predicate marks an inference, and neither is a grammatical exponent of the dimension.

every case was counted

Residue

  • CATEGORYassumedcat.assumed
    fails onderives.payload.failed_premise
    No failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why.
  • CATEGORYdirect evidencecat.direct-evidence
    fails onderives.payload.failed_premise
    No failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why.
  • CATEGORYinferredcat.inferred
    fails onderives.payload.failed_premise
    No failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why.
  • CATEGORYreportedcat.reported
    fails onderives.payload.failed_premise
    No failed premise is named, so this row records that the case is not covered without recording why.

Everything joined to this object

One group per typed edge, in both directions. A1b guarantees no object node is an orphan, so this is the whole navigation: an object with no edges would have failed the build rather than reached this page.

What this object is a kind of

Walking this object's own `is-a` edges: what it is a kind of. Several branches from one object are several classification axes, not competing supertypes.

objects
1
places drawn
1
multi-parent
None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.

Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.

Fan-out per dimension

A4

One row per dimension, largest first. That is a display order, not a verdict: 03-schema.md declares no threshold above which fan-out is too much, so this reports the count and grades nothing.

  • case13 values
  • mood8 values
  • voice8 values
  • aspect7 values
  • aktionsart6 values
  • number6 values
  • person6 values
  • tense6 values
  • comparison4 values
  • evidentiality4 values
  • gender4 values
  • politeness4 values
  • valency4 values
  • animacy3 values
  • definiteness3 values
  • deixis3 values
  • finiteness2 values
  • information structure2 values
  • interrogativity2 values
  • polarity2 values
  • switch-reference2 values

What kinds of this object there are

Walking the `is-a` edges that point at this object: what kinds of it there are. An object reachable two ways is drawn in both places and is still one object.

objects
1
places drawn
1
multi-parent
None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.

Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.

Every one of this object’s 7 edges are rendered above, in the sections its own type owns. Nothing is missing here and nothing is repeated.