CONSTRUCTIONcon.spa.clausula-absoluta-de-participio
cláusula absoluta de participio
A subordinate clause with no finite verb, made of a participle and a phrase it agrees with, stating a completed event that frames the main clause.
The construction is a clause with no finite verb and its own subject, which is what the word absolute records: the subject is not shared with the main clause and is not the main clause subject appearing twice. Its participle agrees with that subject and precedes it, and the fixed order is part of the stored shape rather than a consequence of anything else. What it asserts is that its event was complete before the main event began, so the pattern carries a temporal relation without any tense to carry it with. It belongs to written and formal registers in most varieties, and its spoken competitor is an ordinary subordinate clause with a finite verb.
- status
status documentedasserted, and the sources agree- provenance
provenance authoredwritten for Logos, from first principles- derivation status
derivation_status unstatednobody has said whether it follows from anything- salience
salience - No salience. Where no frequency source applies the object carries none, rather than a default or a guess (03-schema.md §3.5).
- aliases
aliases - metalanguageabsolute participial clause
- sources
sources - SOURCENueva gramática de la lengua española (2009)
src.nueva-gramaticano page in v1 - SOURCEA New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish (Butt and Benjamin)
src.butt-benjaminno page in v1
- SOURCENueva gramática de la lengua española (2009)
Why this is a construction at all
construction.admissionGoldberg's admission test: a template earns storage either by being unpredictable or by being frequent.
- admission
admission unpredictableit is stored because its meaning does not follow from its parts
The slots
construction.slotsAt least two, by the schema: fewer is not a multi-element template. Every filler is a link, never a name in prose.
0el participio, concordado y antepuestolexically specified: only the fillers below may occupy it
- filler
slots[].filler - function
slots[].fn - FUNCTIONnúcleo
fun.spa.nucleo
- filler
1el sujeto de la cláusula, pospuesto al participiopositional: this slot is a place in the string, not a lexical requirement
- filler
slots[].filler - No filler is named. For a positional slot that is the correct reading; for a lexical one it is a gap.
- function
slots[].fn - FUNCTIONsujeto
fun.spa.sujeto
- filler
Slot template
2 slots: 1 constrained, 1 positional, 2 naming a grammatical function.
- el participio, concordado y antepuestoconstrained
- verboclass
names núcleo
- el sujeto de la cláusula, pospuesto al participiopositional
no lexical filler — this slot marks a position only
names sujeto
Confusable with
construction.confusableObjects a reader is likely to mix up with this one, and the difference that separates them. The edge is symmetric and stored once, so this renders on both objects' pages from the one statement.
what tells them apartThe participial clause states a completed event and puts its subject after the verb; the gerund clause states a simultaneous one and orders its subject freely.
Everything joined to this object
One group per typed edge, in both directions. A1b guarantees no object node is an orphan, so this is the whole navigation: an object with no edges would have failed the build rather than reached this page.
What this object is a kind of
Walking this object's own `is-a` edges: what it is a kind of. Several branches from one object are several classification axes, not competing supertypes.
- objects
- 1
- places drawn
- 1
- multi-parent
- None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.
A subordinate clause with no finite verb, made of a participle and a phrase it agrees with, stating a completed event that frames the main clause.
Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.
Fan-out per dimension
A4One row per dimension, largest first. That is a display order, not a verdict: 03-schema.md declares no threshold above which fan-out is too much, so this reports the count and grades nothing.
- case13 values
- mood8 values
- voice8 values
- aspect7 values
- aktionsart6 values
- number6 values
- person6 values
- tense6 values
- comparison4 values
- evidentiality4 values
- gender4 values
- politeness4 values
- valency4 values
- animacy3 values
- definiteness3 values
- deixis3 values
- finiteness2 values
- information structure2 values
- interrogativity2 values
- polarity2 values
- switch-reference2 values
What kinds of this object there are
Walking the `is-a` edges that point at this object: what kinds of it there are. An object reachable two ways is drawn in both places and is still one object.
- objects
- 1
- places drawn
- 1
- multi-parent
- None in this view. This subgraph happens to be a tree, which the explorer draws as one without assuming it is one.
A subordinate clause with no finite verb, made of a participle and a phrase it agrees with, stating a completed event that frames the main clause.
Siblings are listed by name, then by id to break ties. That is a display choice made here and not an order the graph asserts.
has-a
edges.has-athe parent carries this
this object carries
- CATEGORYnonfinite
cat.nonfinitedocumentedmodeinherent
- CATEGORYperfect
cat.perfectdocumentedmodeinherent
selects
edges.selectsthe parent requires this elsewhere
this object requires, elsewhere
- CATEGORYperfective
cat.perfectivedocumentedconditionThe clause states its event as complete before the main event, so it carries no tense of its own and takes its reference point from the main clause.
derives
edges.derivesthe why-chain